
Beyond the GLP-1 Hype
GLP1βs usage for weight loss is becoming more and more common, and for good reason. Theyβre effective. GLP1βs are the first real answer from the pharmaceutical world, for giving weight loss.
However just like with any new revolutionary drug before it, comparisons exist. There are always different methods of achieving the same end goal, weight loss. Letβs dive into a comparison of 3 different methods and analyze their results, safety and cost. By the end of this article youβll be able to decide for yourself what is best for you.
The 3 Methods
There are many options for weight loss, however to be objective weβve picked the 3 with
clinical studies evidence (not what people feel is working, but what actually worked).
Real evidence backed by real studies.
01.
Calorie Deficit Alone
The calorie deficit is everything when it comes to weight loss. There is absolutely no weight loss without the calorie deficit. It is an unshakeable law, just like gravity, our constant rain and traffic jams (on Friday evenings especially).
All methods including GLP1βs, natural supplements, exercise, only give someone weight loss through first achieving the calorie deficit. Therefore for point 1 above, weβll be focusing on the manual and deliberate calorie restriction. Basically, reducing your portions or eating less calories than what you normally eat. AKA; a diet.
02.
GLP-1 Drugs
GLP-1 drugs are being formulated for weight loss now rather than just for diabetes when they were initially launched. There are many drug companies with their own version of it (just like how both Malaysia and Singapore have their own versions of the same dishes).
Weβll be focusing on evidence of weight loss results from published studies. These are effective, and reduce the mental turmoil that can come with long term manual calorie restriction.
03.
Trifect by Vitera
Natural weight loss supplements and remedies have, and always will exist. We can even imagine from the beginning of time, there may have been a nice cave-woman mak cik recommending a special ingredient to help reduce bloating or weight.
Natural supplements have come a long way from being a culturally suggested secret. There are now efficacious formulas that have been tested with the same strict clinical standards as their pharmaceutical counterparts.
Average Weight Loss Percentage over 12 Months
Results Analysis in 12-Month Trends.
To find the most effective method for weight loss, we will be using results from 12 months. This is to avoid any fluctuations month to month. Important as with women in particular, weight loss results will vary due to timing of the hormonal cycle, and accumulation of water weight.
1. Calorie Deficit - Results:
A peer-reviewed study conducted by professionals tracked results over 12 months. The participants were given a 25% calorie deficit (i.e; cutting 1/4th of their usual portions).
Interestingly, it was found that over the 12 months, not all participants could maintain this cut in calories. Therefore mental fatigue was a concern that did affect the results. It highlights the importance of mental health and fatigue in a weight loss journey.
2. GLP-1s - Results:
There were 4 studies in particular using 2 different types of GLP-1 drugs. The average weight loss results range from 12.9% to 16.5%.
Weβve used 15% in our comparison, higher than the average of these four studies. When compared to the calorie deficit alone, we can understand why the FDA-Approved drugs are becoming more and more popular. They reduce mental turmoil.
3. Trifect - Results:
Doctor-led studies measured weight loss, inches and fat percentage reduction as well as conducting full medical profiles before and after supplementation.
Participants did not exercise regularly, and there was no manual restriction of types of foods. Carbohydrates and sugar were consumed throughout the journey, including fried foods.
Achieves a similarly βautomaticβ calorie deficit like GLP-1βs, because participants feel fuller faster and have reduced cravings.
Safety Profile Analysis
Physical & Mental Impact Comparison
| Feature | Calorie Deficit | GLP-1 | Trifect by Vitera |
|---|---|---|---|
| POSITIVES |
β Healthy
β Natural weight loss mechanism
|
β Helps manage mental fatigue
β Effective results
|
β Helps manage mental fatigue
β Improve kidneys, heart, etc.
β Natural ingredients
|
| NEGATIVES |
β High mental fatigue
β Difficult long-term maintenance
|
β 50% experience nausea throughout journey
β 31.3% experience diarrhea
β 195% increase in major depression risk
β 108% increase in anxiety
|
β Mild nausea for first 1-2 days in 20% of people
|
Cost Analysis:
In order to standardize the cost comparison, weβll be calculating how much
it will be to lose 1kg using the 3 methods.
This is simulated for a 100kg woman, over 12 months.
Calorie Deficit
Cost of buying healthier food, meal prep, etc.
GLP-1
Cost of prescriptions
Trifect
Cost of supplements
Summary Analysis
Therefore for someone wanting to lose 10 kgs, the investment ranges from RM 1,040 to RM 14,400. Trifect offers a scientifically-backed balance of efficiency and economic sense at RM 1,550.
The choice is yours.
Ready to Begin?
Join the clinical-led revolution in weight loss. Science-based, natural, and effective.
